No Prognostic Impact of Graft-to-Recipient Weight Ratio on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND The effects of a low graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are unclear. The present study examined whether the GRWR had an impact on the rate of HCC recurrence following living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective observational single-center study included 856 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC between January 2006 and December 2016 at Asan Medical Center and evaluated the association between GRWR and post-transplant tumor recurrence. RESULTS Of the 856 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC, 54 (6.3%), 272 (31.8%), 274 (32.0%), and 256 (29.9%) had GRWR <0.8%, 0.8-0.99%, 1.0-1.19%, and ≥1.2%, respectively. Analysis of all patients revealed that the disease-free survival (DFS; P=0.545) and overall survival (OS; P=0.313) rates were not different in these 4 groups. Subgroups analyses also showed that GRWR did not influence survival rates in patients within (DFS: P=0.398; OS: P=0.676) and beyond (DFS: P=0.602; OS: P=0.649) the Milan criteria, or in patients with alpha-fetoprotein-des-γ-carboxyprothrombin-tumor volume scores <5log (DFS: P=0.633; OS: p=0.285) and ≥5log (DFS: P=0.674; OS: P=0.906). CONCLUSIONS GRWR less than 0.8% did not demonstrate a noteworthy prognostic influence on the oncological results among patients who had undergone LDLT for HCC. High-volume multi-center studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Achieving 400 Living Donor Liver Transplantations Annually During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a major impact on liver transplantation (LT) and living donor programs globally. PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to present the principles and strategies of our LT program during the pandemic period and describe its achievements. BASIC PROCEDURES: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 1417 LTs performed at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, from 2020 to 2022. Of these, 216 recipients who received transplants from deceased donors were excluded, and 1201 recipients who received transplants from 1268 live donors were included in the study, including 38 children <18 years old. MAIN FINDINGS: Among the 1201 living donor LT (LDLT) recipients, the most common indication for LT was unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (315/1163, 27.1%) in adults and biliary atresia (29/38, 76.3%) in pediatric recipients. Emergency LDLT was performed in 40 patients (3.3%). The median model of end-stage liver disease and pediatric end-stage liver disease scores were 13.9 ± 7.2 and 13.8 ± 7.1, respectively. In-hospital mortality of recipients was higher than usual at 2.2%, but the cause of death was not related to COVID-19 infection. Of the 1268 live donors who underwent hepatectomy for liver donation, 660 (52.1%) underwent hepatectomy using a minimally invasive approach. Although 17 (1.3%) live donors experienced major complications, there were no serious life-threatening complications and no mortality. CONCLUSION: Even in a pandemic era, a team with well-established infection control protocols, patient-tailored surgical strategies, and thorough perioperative care can maintain LDLT at a similar quantitative and qualitative level as in a non-pandemic era.

Mini-incision Right Hepatectomy for Living Donor Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: The application of a minimally invasive technique to graft procurement in living donor liver transplantation has minimized skin incisions and led to early recovery in donor hepatectomy while ensuring donor safety. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of mini-incision living donor right hepatectomy compared with conventional open surgery. METHODS: The study population consisted of 448 consecutive living donors who underwent living donor right hepatectomy performed by a single surgeon between January 2015 and December 2019. According to the incision type, the donors were divided into 2 groups: a right subcostal mini-incision group (M group: n = 187) and a conventional J-shaped incision group (C group: n = 261). A propensity score matching analysis was conducted to overcome bias. RESULTS: The estimated graft volume and measured graft weight were significantly lower in the M group ( P = 0.000). The total of 17 (3.8%) postoperative complications were identified. The readmission rate and overall postoperative complication rate of donors was not significantly different between the groups. The biliary complication rates in the recipients were 12.6% and 8.6% in the C group and M group, respectively ( P = 0.219). Hepatic artery thrombosis requiring revision developed in 2 patients (0.8%) in the C group and 7 patients (3.7%) in the M group ( P = 0.038). After propensity score matching, these complications were not significantly different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-incision living donor right hepatectomy shows comparable biliary complications to open surgery and is considered a safe and feasible operative technique.

Favorable Prognostic Factors for Survival Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis After Hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate prognostic factors of recurrence and survival associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 161 patients with HCC with PVTT who underwent hepatectomy between January 2003 and January 2014 at the Asan Medical Center. Regression analyses were conducted to identify favorable predictive factors for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 15.9 months, while 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS was 65.0%, 38.4%, and 36.0%, respectively, and 1-year RFS was 25.5%. There were no significant differences in OS and RFS between the patients with portal vein invasion (Vp) 1-2 and Vp3-4 PVTT. Patients with intrahepatic recurrence had significantly better overall survival than patients with extrahepatic recurrence. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation were the most effective treatments for intrahepatic metastasis, and surgery was the most effective treatment for extrahepatic metastasis. On multivariate analysis, absence of esophageal varices, maximal tumor size < 5 cm, tumor location in single lobe, and anatomical resection were favorable prognostic factors for OS and R0 resection, and absence of microvascular invasion was a favorable prognostic factor for RFS. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcome of patients with HCC with PVTT can be improved under consideration of favorable prognostic factors including absence of esophageal varices, maximal tumor size < 5 cm, tumor location in single lobe, and anatomical resection, R0 resection, and absence of microvascular invasion. In addition, recurrent HCC required aggressive management to prolong overall survival.

Efficacy and safety of adhesion barrier in living-donor liver transplantation with right liver graft to prevent delayed gastric emptying.

Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is a common complication of liver transplantation. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of the application of an adhesion barrier for preventing DGE in living-donor liver transplantation. This retrospective study included 453 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation using a right lobe graft between January 2018 and August 2019, and the incidence of postoperative DGE and complications was compared between patients in whom adhesion barrier was used (n=179 patients) and those in whom adhesion barrier was not used (n=274 patients). We performed 1:1 propensity score matching between the 2 groups, and 179 patients were included in each group. DGE was defined according to the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery classification. The use of adhesion barrier was significantly associated with a lower overall incidence of postoperative DGE in liver transplantation (30.7 vs. 17.9%; p =0.002), including grades A (16.8 vs. 9.5%; p =0.03), B (7.3 vs. 3.4%; p =0.08), and C (6.6 vs. 5.5%; p =0.50). After propensity score matching, similar results were observed for the overall incidence of DGE (29.6 vs. 17.9%; p =0.009), including grades A (16.8 vs. 9.5%; p =0.04), B (6.7 vs. 3.4%; p =0.15), and C (6.1 vs. 5.0%; p =0.65). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed a significant correlation between the use of adhesion barrier and a low incidence of DGE. There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The application of an adhesion barrier could be a safe and feasible method to reduce the incidence of postoperative DGE in living-donor liver transplantation.

Salvage living donor liver transplantation versus repeat liver resection for patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis: A propensity score-matched comparison.

Following curative liver resection (LR), resectable tumor recurrence in patients with preserved liver function leads to deciding between a repeat LR and a salvage liver transplantation (LT), if a donor's liver is available. This retrospective study compared survival outcomes and recurrence pattern following salvage living donor LT (LDLT) and repeat LR in patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent repeat LR (n = 163) or LDLT (n = 84) for recurrent HCC following curative resections, between January 2005 and December 2017 at a single institution. A 1:1 propensity score matching led to 42 patients per group. Disease-specific and recurrence-free survival were significantly better in the salvage LDLT group than in the repeat LR group (p = .042; HR = 2.40; 95% CI, 0.69-6.00 and p < .001; HR = 4.23; 95% CI, 2.05-8.71, respectively). Despite significant differences in recurrence patterns between the two groups (p = .019), the patient death rates, after recurrence, were similar for both groups (p = .760). This study indicates that salvage LDLT is superior to repeat LR for treating patients with transplantable, intrahepatic HCC recurrence, even in patients with Child-Pugh class A liver cirrhosis.

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation After Conversion From Twice-Daily to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients: A Phase 4, Open-Label, Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Simplifying immunosuppressive therapy after liver transplant may improve patient compliance, thereby preventing acute rejection and graft loss. This phase 4, open-label, single-center study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus conversion in stable liver transplant recipients. METHODS: Between May 2017 and January 2019, twice-daily tacrolimus was converted to once-daily tacrolimus in 101 stable recipients at least 12 months post-liver transplant in Asan Medical Center. The doses of both drugs was converted to 1:1, and the target trough level was 5 to 10 ng/mL. We prospectively analyzed graft function, drug compliance, and adverse reactions after switching regimen for 24 weeks. RESULTS: There was no acute rejection confirmed histologically within 24 weeks, which was the primary endpoint, and there was no chronic rejection, fatal deterioration of liver function, or death in any patient during this period. After conversion, the trough level of tacrolimus decreased, and the mean ± standard deviation differences between the trough level and baseline level were 1.46 (±2.41) ng/mL, 0.43 (±2.08) ng/mL, and 0.07 (±2.73) ng/mL at 3, 12, and 24 weeks after conversion, respectively. Despite transient fluctuations of the trough level, there was no evidence of rejection or graft dysfunction. There were 37 adverse reactions after conversion; most of them were mild, and thrombocytopenia developed in 1 patient as an adverse drug response. Drug compliance improved after conversion according to questionnaire responses. CONCLUSIONS: The conversion to once-daily tacrolimus in stable liver transplant recipients is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy improving drug compliance.

Comparison of skeletal muscle index-based formula and body surface area-based formula for calculating standard liver volume.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Formula-derived standard liver volume (SLV) has been clinically used for living donor liver transplantation and hepatic resection. The majority of currently available SLV formulae are based on body surface are (BSA). However, they often show a wide range of error. Skeletal muscle index measured at the third lumbar vertebra level (L3SMI) appears to reflect lean body mass. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of L3SMI-based formula and BSA-based formula for calculating SLV. METHODS: The study cohort was 500 hundred living liver donors who underwent surgery between January 2010 and December 2013. Computed tomography images were used for liver volumetry and skeletal muscle area measurement. RESULTS: The study cohort included 250 male and 250 female donors. Their age, BSA, L3SMI, and body mass index were 26.8±8.7 years, 1.68±0.16 m2, 45.6±9.0 cm2/m2, and 21.7±2.5 kg/m2, respectively. The BSA-based SLV formula was "SLV (ml)=-362.3+901.5×BSA (m2) (r=0.71, r2=0.50, p<0.001)". The L3SMI-based SLV formula was "SLV (ml)=471.9+14.9×L3SMI (cm2/m2) (r=0.65, r2=0.42, p<0.001)". Correlation coefficients were similar in subgroup analyses with 250 male donors and 250 female donors. There was a crude correlation between L3SMI and body mass index (r=0.51, r2=0.27, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that SLV calculation with L3SMI-based formula does not appear to be superior to the currently available BSA-based formulae.

Clinicopathological correlation and post-resection outcomes of hepatic angiomyolipoma.

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Angiomyolipoma is a rare neoplasm of mesenchymal origin derived from perivascular epithelioid cells. Due to rarity, hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML) has been often misdiagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or other hypervascular liver tumors based on imaging studies. This study investigated the clinicopathological correlation and post-resection outcomes of HAML. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 40 patients who underwent hepatic resection (HR) for HAML between 2008 and 2018. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 42.6±11.4 years and there were 30 (75.0%) females. Hepatitis B and C virus infection was present in 8 patients (20.0%) and 1 patient (2.5%), respectively. Preoperative diagnoses on imaging studies were HCC in 23 (57.5%) patients, HAML in 14 (35.0%) patients, focal nodular hyperplasia in 2 (5.0%) patients, and hepatic adenoma in 1 (2.5%) patient. Percutaneous liver biopsy was performed in 10 (25.0%) patients and HAML was diagnosed in all patients. Only 3 patients (7.5%) showed a slight elevation in the level of liver tumor markers. Major HR was performed in 10 (25.0%). Laparoscopic HR was performed in 9 (22.5%). The mean tumor size was 4.8±3.9 cm and single tumor was present in 38 (95.0%) patients. Currently, all the patients are alive without tumor recurrence during the follow-up observation period of 75.7±37.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: HAML is a rare form of primary liver tumor and is often misdiagnosed as HCC or other hypervascular tumors. Although HAML is benign in nature, it has malignant potential, thus resection is indicated if the tumor grows or malignancy cannot be excluded.

Clinical sequence of an adult recipient undergone split liver transplantation using a right liver graft with erroneous deprivation of the middle hepatic vein trunk: a case report.

The anatomy of middle hepatic vein (MHV) varies widely, and some individuals have aberrant MHV anatomy, thus there is risk of iatrogenic damage to graft MHV during liver splitting. We present the clinical sequences of an adult recipient who received a split right liver graft with erroneous deprivation of the MHV trunk. This is the case was a 58-year-old male patient with hepatitis B virus-associated liver cirrhosis who suffered from hepatic encephalopathy. The split right liver graft had a graft-to-recipient weight ratio of 2.1%. Soon after graft reperfusion, large-sized hepatic venous congestion (HVC) appeared at the graft liver surface, indicating lack of MHV drainage. The amount of HVC was approximately 20% of the right liver graft mass at day 1, which had gradually reduced on follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans. Although liver function recovered progressively, the patient remained bed-ridden because of pre-existing hypoxic brain damage. The patient passed away 4 years after transplantation because of pneumonia and multi-organ failure. The present case implies that there is some possibility of unrecognized damage to the graft MHV during liver splitting, suggesting the necessity of preoperative donor abdomen CT scan and preparation of intraoperative ultrasonography for easy evaluation of graft liver MHV anatomy.